Russia quiets Voice of America
The Voice of America, which has broadcast from inside Russia since the end of the Cold War, has been silenced in the new chill between Russia and the United States.
VOA's over-the-air broadcasts on the 810 AM frequency in Moscow ceased at the start of April, when Russian authorities refused to renew a long-standing broadcasting contract, according to a statement by the U.S. Broadcasting Board of Governors, the independent federal agency that oversees the American government's international media operations.
The Voice of Russia, the nation's international radio broadcasting service, said April 10 that the government in Moscow moved against an “Orwellian U.S. propaganda tool.” The action fell amid mounting tensions with the United States and its allies over Ukraine and Russia's annexation of Crimea.
“The Russian Government, which has so far been patient as the U.S./NATO attempt to continue to surround it with missiles and continue to demonize everything Russian, is beginning to take serious measures to protect itself, its people and its allies,” the Voice of Russia said on its website.
While Russian authorities ended VOA's terrestrial broadcasts in Russia, the service funded through the Congress continues to expand audio and video news and information online.
“That's where the next-generation audiences are in any case,” said Lynne Weil, a spokeswoman for the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- 500 U.S. troops en route to Nepal with aid
- Ex-Gitmo detainees protest in Uruguay
- 10 Taliban terrorists get life in girl’s attack
- Mexican teen wrongly taken to U.S. returned
- Iraqi ambassador to U.S.: Global rejection of ISIS crucial
- Pope backs equal pay for women, calls wage disparity ‘pure scandal’
- Iraq turns to Shiite militias to fight ISIS
- May Day incites protests worldwide
- Yemen city crippled by siege, bombing; civilians isolated