Competency of alleged 9/11 conspirator at issue for Gitmo trial
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE — Lawyers and the alleged 9/11 conspirators will return to the war court on Monday for the first time this year in a U.S. government bid to determine whether one of the accused plotters is competent to stand trial.
At the last hearings, in December, the Army judge ejected alleged conspirator Ramzi bin al Shibh four times for shouting that guards were keeping him awake at night in his cell. The prosecutor sought an evaluation on whether the 41-year-old Yemeni was competent to go to trial, stalling the proceedings.
So now, starting Monday, the hearings resume with a sealed prosecution proposal to call witnesses on the competency question that hangs over the terrorism trial of five men accused of conspiring in the hijackings that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York, Pennsylvania and at the Pentagon.
Bin al Shibh allegedly aspired to become one of the 9/11 suicide hijackers, but he couldn't obtain a visa. He is accused of helping Khalid Sheik Mohammed organize the attacks from Hamburg, Germany.
The prosecutor, Army Brig. Gen. Mark Martins, proposes to execute the men if they are convicted. He wants to start choosing a military jury in January.
But Bin al Shibh has refused to speak with court-appointed military mental health experts about his complaint that the military is causing noises and vibrations in his cell at Guantanamo's clandestine prison for former CIA prisoners, called Camp 7. His is a long-standing complaint that prosecutors say is baseless.
The prosecution is seeking a judicial finding that Bin al Shibh is competent enough to go on trial but delusional about what's going on in his prison.
“The government will not be presenting any witnesses who will opine on whether Mr. bin al Shibh is presently competent to stand trial, as no one has had a recent face-to-face forensic interview to make such a determination,” prosecutors wrote to the judge on March 27, according to a recipient of the memo.
So instead, the goal of this week's hearing is to “establish a record that JTF-GTMO (the prison bureaucracy) is not intentionally producing noises, odors or vibrations to intentionally interfere with Mr. bin al Shibh's confinement.”
The request opens up the possibility of testimony at the war court about what's going on at Camp 7, where the military segregates former CIA captives from the others in the detention center that contains 154 prisoners.
The admiral in charge of the prison camps said in an interview last month that Camp 7 has structural problems — cracking floors and walls, and doors that don't open and close properly. No problems, according to Rear Adm. Richard Butler, are serious enough in his opinion to jeopardize a 2009 Pentagon finding of compliance with the Geneva Conventions that govern how nations treat war prisoners.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Nuclear talks bog down as Iran team balks at key decisions, envoys say
- Relentless heat wave kills more than 1,000 in India
- Americans with taste for mojitos flock to Havana
- ISIS solidifies grip on Syrian town of Palmyra
- Ireland voters expected to OK gay marriage
- New parties shake up politics around Spain
- Iraqi militias begin move on Ramadi
- Rocket fired from Gaza Strip strikes Israeli port
- American reporter’s espionage trial begins
- Attacks in Iraq target Shiites
- Islamic State’s takeover of Palmyra puts Syria’s ancient ruins in peril