Third mate unfamiliar with waters where South Korean ferry sank
MOKPO, South Korea — The inexperienced third mate at the helm of the South Korean ferry that sank last week had never navigated the challenging waters where the accident occurred, prosecutors said on Saturday.
The third mate, 25, is in custody along with the captain and a third crew member.
The number of confirmed dead rose to 46 when divers broke a window in the submerged ferry and retrieved 10 more bodies, Kim Kwang-hyun, a coast guard official, said on Sunday. These apparently were the first bodies recovered from inside the ferry since it capsized on Wednesday during a journey from the port of Incheon to the southern holiday island of Jeju.
“Divers broke through the window of a passenger cabin... and pulled out three bodies,” a coast guard official told the AFP news agency. All three were wearing lifejackets, he said.
Earlier in the day, four bodies were discovered in the murky waters near the ferry, South Korea's Yonhap news agency reported.
Strong currents and rain have prevented divers from searching inside the ferry.
Authorities say 174 passengers have been rescued, 265 remain missing.
Shin Won-nam, the head of the Emergency Management Center, said it was very unlikely someone trapped alive in the capsized boat could have survived this long.
Relatives have begun providing DNA samples to help identify the dead.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pakistan says U.S. cut trees illegally
- Afghan president calls for ‘holy war’ against corruption
- Professors slam Modi’s record
- Hungary bars migrants from trains, raising fears they’ll turn to smugglers
- China’s WWII parade of military might stirs up Taiwan, others in Asia
- European Union struggles for answers as migrant influx raises tensions