Pistorius team denies claim he took acting lesson
A spokeswoman for Oscar Pistorius angrily denied claims by a South African journalist that the double-amputee Olympian took acting lessons before testifying at his murder trial.
Jani Allan, in an open letter to Pistorius on her blog, says she has it “from a reliable source that you are taking acting lessons for your days in court. Your coach has an impossible task.”
Allan later told The Sunday People, a British publication, that she obtained her information from “extremely reliable sources” that Pistorius was being coached by a famous “close actor friend.”
Anneliese Burgess, spokeswoman for the Pistorius family, said in a statement on Tuesday that Allan's “suggestion that Mr. Pistorius ‘took acting lessons' is totally devoid of any truth.” She added that Pistorius has never met Allan.
Pistorius, 27, frequently sobbed and sometimes appeared to vomit in court in the days leading up to his testimony. He cried often while on the witness stand.
“We deny in the strongest terms the contents of her letter in as far it relates to our client and further deny that our client has undergone any ‘acting lessons' or any form of emotional coaching,” Burgess said. “This type of comment makes a mockery of the enormous human tragedy involving the Steenkamp family and our client and his family.”
Pistorius is accused of fatally shooting Reeva Steenkamp, an actress and model, in the predawn hours of Valentine's Day 2013. Prosecutor Gerrie Nel, who grilled Pistorius for five days in a South Africa courtroom, repeatedly dismissed claims from the so-called Blade Runner that he was terrified an intruder was hiding in his bathroom and accidentally shot Steenkamp.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.