200 injured in Seoul subway crash
SEOUL — A subway train plowed into the back of another train at a station in South Korea's capital on Friday, injuring about 200, including about 150 who were hospitalized with bruises and other mostly minor injuries.
According to local media, there were long delays in providing instructions to passengers about what to do. That struck a nerve in South Korea, where the captain in an April 16 ferry sinking that killed hundreds has been condemned for waiting 30 minutes to issue an evacuation order as the ship sank.
A preliminary investigation suggested the train's automatic distance control system malfunctioned.
The driver of the moving train told officials that he applied the emergency brake after noticing a stop signal but wasn't able to halt in time, Seoul Metro official Jeong Su-young said.
Fire officer Kim Kyung-su said emergency officials arrived at the scene about two to three minutes after a passenger informed them of the accident.
Lee Dong-hyun, a passenger on the incoming train, described a chaotic scene after the crash. “It stopped suddenly ... and everyone screamed,” he said.
Lee said the door leading to the next car was crushed and couldn't be opened.
The accident comes as South Koreans are criticizing the government for lax safety practices that many feel contributed to the sinking of the ferry Sewol, which left more than 300 people, mostly high school students, dead or missing.
The subway accident received extensive media coverage and was the top news on television and social media sites.
“I was so surprised and wasn't sure what to do,” said Lim Seong-eun, 26, who commutes by subway every day.
Lim said her mother called her to tell her about the accident and ask if she was on the train.
“It's been less than one month since the Sewol disaster and I'm a little anxious that an accident like this happened in a place used by lots of people,” Lim said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.