3rd-place finisher backs former foreign minister in run-off for Afghan presidency
KABUL, Afghanistan — Former Foreign Minister Abdullah Abdullah received a boost in the race for the Afghan presidency on Sunday when one of the pre-election favorites dropped out and backed his team before next month's expected run-off.
Zalmay Rassoul, who finished third in April's first round with 11.5 percent of the vote, said he endorsed Abdullah to strengthen national unity and because the pair campaigned on similar platforms.
Preliminary results showed Abdullah and his closest rival, former World Bank economist Ashraf Ghani, sharing more than 75 percent of the vote but neither winning an absolute majority.
On Wednesday, the Afghan election commission will announce official first-round results from the election, in which President Hamid Karzai was constitutionally barred from running again.
Evidence of widespread fraud reported by the country's Independent Election Complaints Commission has taken the gloss off the third presidential poll since U.S.-led forces drove the Taliban from power in 2001.
The vote marks the first democratic transfer of power in the country's history.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- IMF chief investigated for negligence in 2008 case in France
- Right-wingers say Israel failed ‘so long as Hamas exists’
- Russian help implicit in new separatist push into Ukraine
- Kenyan rangers killing poachers, rights group say
- Coast Guard fires in defense on Iran boat
- ‘Holocaust T-shirt’ for kids discontinued in Spain
- Witnesses recount secret July raid to free journalist at ISIS base in Syria
- Colombia drug lord’s most loyal assassin courts Hollywood upon early release from prison
- Neanderthals, humans may have mingled, study finds
- Landslide in Japan leaves dozens dead
- Ukrainian troops regaining control