Sentencing for Olmert stuns Israel
JERUSALEM — Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was sentenced on Tuesday to six years in prison and ordered to pay a fine of about $290,000. He was convicted in March of taking bribes from real estate developers when he was mayor of Jerusalem more than a decade ago.
Describing Olmert's acts as moral turpitude, Tel Aviv District Court Judge David Rosen said the higher the public post of an individual, the tougher the punishment for bribery should be.
The judge's harsh words and the prospect of jail time for a former prime minister — Olmert served in the post from 2006 to 2009 — sent shock waves through Israel's political establishment and society, with many referring to it as a sad day in the nation's history.
This is the first time such a high-level Israeli official has been found guilty of a breach-of-trust crime, although former president Moshe Katsav is serving a seven-year sentence for rape, and several government ministers have been convicted of crimes.
“This is a sad day for me, personally,” President Shimon Peres told Israeli reporters during a state visit to Norway. “But this is the legal process which is custom in democratic states.”
Six other officials in the case were sentenced, including Olmert's chief engineer, Uri Shitrit, who will serve seven years. The others received three- to five-year sentences. Additional officials, including another former Jerusalem mayor, Uri Lupolianski, will be sentenced in the coming months for their parts in the affair.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.