Israel in bind on force-feeding bill
JERUSALEM — Proposed legislation to permit the force-feeding of Palestinian prisoners on a hunger strike is pitting Israel's government against much of the country's medical community — including the main doctors' association, which contends the practice amounts to torture.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly asked to fast-track the bill as a hunger strike by dozens of Palestinian detainees enters its sixth week.
At least 65 of 290 participating detainees have been hospitalized since the first group began a hunger strike on April 24. Many are administrative detainees, held for months or years without charges.
There have been near-daily Palestinian demonstrations backing the prisoners, including one Wednesday in the West Bank. Dozens of university students threw stones at Israeli soldiers who responded with tear gas.
Families of hunger strikers say they support the fast, despite the risks.
“My husband is in Israeli jails without knowing why and when this nightmare is going to end,” Lamees Faraj said of her husband, Abdel Razeq, a member of a small, hard-line Palestine Liberation Organization faction who has been in administrative detention for nearly eight of the last 20 years.
Faced with the second large-scale Palestinian hunger strike in two years, Israeli officials are promoting a bill that would allow a judge to sanction force-feeding if an inmate's life is perceived to be in danger.
A judge must not consider only the prisoner's wishes but also possible damage to the state, said Yoel Hadar, a legal adviser in the Public Security Ministry, which initiated the bill. He said a death in custody could trigger prison riots or unrest in the Palestinian territories or elsewhere.
“We want the judge to take into consideration what will happen to the country if something happens,” Hadar said.
There has been mounting opposition from Israel's medical establishment. The Israel Medical Association urges physicians not to cooperate.
“It goes against the DNA of the doctors to force treatment on a patient,” spokeswoman Ziva Miral said. “Force-feeding is torture, and we can't have doctors participating in torture.”
She said the World Medical Association, an umbrella for national medical associations, opposes the practice. The WMA said as recently as 2006 that “forcible feeding is never ethically acceptable.”
Israel's National Council of Bioethics has weighed in, saying it opposes the proposed bill.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.