Chinese jets' flight over sea prompts Japan to file protest
TOKYO — Japan lodged a diplomatic protest with Beijing on Wednesday after Chinese military jets flew near Japanese military aircraft over the East China Sea, an official said.
Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera said two Chinese SU27 fighters approached as close as 100 feet to Japanese aircraft that morning. The Chinese planes posed a danger to the Japanese aircraft, he said, and a serious incident could have occurred.
The Japanese planes were on a regular surveillance mission in international airspace, Onodera said, and Japan would continue to defend its territory.
Calls to the Chinese defense ministry's press office rang unanswered.
The countries have increased patrols by ships and military planes to press their conflicting territorial claims in the East China Sea. They had a similar incident on May 24.
Tensions between the Asian rivals worsened in recent years over a group of uninhabited islands in the East China Sea called Senkaku in Japanese and Diaoyu in Chinese. Japan controls the islands, but China also claims them.
Japanese fighter jets were scrambled in response to foreign aircraft 810 times last year, more than half of them Chinese, according to a recent Defense Ministry report.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Dissension cracks Taliban leadership
- Experimental Ebola vaccine could stop virus in West Africa
- WikiLeaks says U.S. spied on another ally: Japan
- Extremist strikes again in attack on gay parade in Jerusalem
- Israelis remember how summer conflict affected beach ritual
- China says U.S. trying to militarize South China Sea
- Nigeria celebrates year without polio
- Former Chilean officers charged
- Defense secretary touts success of Kurdish fighters in war on ISIS
- India hangs man who raised funds in support of 1993’s deadly Mumbai bombings