American drone strikes resume in Pakistan, kill 16 militants
PESHAWAR, Pakistan — Pakistan on Thursday condemned two airstrikes that reportedly killed 16 suspected militants and appeared to mark an end to a nearly six-month pause in the CIA's covert drone operations in the country's lawless tribal areas.
After six militants were reported killed in the first strike in the North Waziristan tribal region late Wednesday, drones fired six missiles at a residential compound in the same area on Thursday morning and killed 10, according to Pakistani security sources.
“These strikes are a violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity,” Pakistan's Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
The United States last used drones to attack in December.
The CIA has decreased use of the unmanned aircraft due to mounting Pakistani opposition and restrictions on their use announced by the Obama administration.
The efforts by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to get the United States to rein in the use of drones while he pursues peace talks with insurgents probably ended this week when militants stormed the airport in the city of Karachi, leaving 36 people dead, including the 10 attackers.
Former U.S. military officials had indicated that American forces would be likely to step up operations against Taliban insurgents and their allies in Pakistan's tribal belt once Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who was held captive by the Taliban in North Waziristan, was freed nearly two weeks ago.
Four of the six militants killed on Wednesday in the Darga Mandi area were reportedly from Uzbekistan, where an Islamist group claimed that it participated in the Karachi attack.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.