Share This Page

Taliban kills dozens in days-long attempt to retake former Afghan stronghold

| Saturday, June 28, 2014, 8:54 p.m.

KABUL, Afghanistan — The Taliban has amassed hundreds of fighters in Helmand province in its most ambitious attempt this year to seize ground as the U.S. combat mission winds down in Afghanistan, according to Afghan officials.

The fighting has gone on for nearly a week in the southern province, a former Taliban stronghold, demonstrating the insurgency's ability to mobilize against much improved, but still inexperienced, Afghan security forces.

As of Saturday, the toll from the violence remained unclear, but at least several dozen civilians, soldiers and police officers have been killed, Afghan officials said.

“It was a coordinated and organized attack on northern Helmand,” said Omer Zowak, the provincial spokesman. “Afghan security forces have pushed the Taliban back ... but they are resisting in some parts of Sangin district.”

Sangin, the main target of the Taliban offensive, lies in a valley along the Helmand River where for years insurgents have staged periodic attacks on Afghan and international troops. Last week, 45 civilians were killed in Sangin alone and 4,000 more were displaced, according to the district governor, Sulaiman Shah.

“The Taliban booby-trapped people's home, putting bombs in front of their houses,” Shah said. “The situation was very bad.”

When U.S. troops began to leave Helmand last year, many American officials predicted that the Taliban would attempt to dominate the Afghan forces left in charge of Sangin. For years, the district's poppy harvest and drug production centers were a financial boon to insurgents. Over the past two summers, though, the Taliban appeared to make retaking Sangin a priority.

Last week's fighting spread to the districts surrounding Sangin, prompting reinforcements to be sent to the area. Top Afghan commanders flew over the area in helicopters from Kabul to assess the situation.

The assault appears to be the insurgents' most effective attempt to date to gain ground in Helmand.

A spokesman for the Interior Ministry, Sediq Sediqi, suggested that more than 1,000 insurgents were involved in the attack. But Afghan officials insisted that the fighting was nearing an end, with troops refusing to cede territory.

“The clearing operation is going on. We've killed hundreds of Taliban fighters,” said Gen. Zahir Azimi, a spokesman for the Afghan National Army, who added that the Taliban had failed in its bid to destabilize Helmand.

The Taliban said its efforts had yielded enormous gains. On its official website, the organization claimed to have overrun five government outposts in Sangin.

After the troop surge in 2009, thousands of Marines were sent to northern Helmand, where the casualty rate was among the highest in the war. The gains at that time attracted attention from Washington.

In March 2011, Defense Secretary Robert Gates called Sangin “a major strategic breakthrough.”

Security has deteriorated significantly since then. Afghan officials still believe the government's hold on the district can be sustained, but their belief is conditional.

“I do believe in the Afghan security forces, but I have a demand for the international community. Before they leave, they should equip our army and police with mortar equipment and strengthen our air force,” said Shah.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.