World War I's global effects evident 100 years later
The shot that changed the world rang out on a sunny summer's morning in Southeastern Europe. No one knew then that the assassin's bullet would spell the death not just of an Austrian aristocrat but the entire global order, with four empires and millions of lives lost in a conflict on a scale never before seen.
Exactly 100 years ago Saturday, Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian empire, and his wife, Sophie, were shot at close range by a young Serbian nationalist on the streets of Sarajevo.
The assassination set off a chain reaction that, a month later, culminated in a continent at war. What many thought would be a brief, even heroic, conflict metastasized into a four-year nightmare that engulfed dozens more nations, including the United States, redrew the map of Europe and introduced the world to new horrors such as chemical weapons and shell shock. A second, even deadlier global catastrophe, which had its seeds in the first, struck within a generation.
For many modern-day Europeans, the conflict is emblematic of the madness of war.
In such a cataclysm there are no winners, many say, and it's fruitless to seek logic or justification in soldiers asphyxiating in gas attacks, or waves of men charging over trenches to be mowed down by machine-gun fire within seconds.
Last week, European leaders gathered to remember those sacrifices at a solemn ceremony in Ypres, Belgium, where countless soldiers fell on the muddy fields of Flanders.
“This commemoration is not about the end of the war or any battle or victory,” said Herman Van Rompuy, a former Belgian prime minister. “It is about how it could start, about the mindless march to the abyss, about the sleepwalking — above all, about the millions who were killed on all sides, on all fronts.”
Van Rompuy is president of the council of the 28-nation European Union, an expression of regional comity and solidarity that could scarcely have been imagined 100 years ago.
The union is far from perfect: Leaders bickered publicly over who ought to be handed one of the EU's plum jobs, and recent elections to the European Parliament produced a crop of winners from parties avowedly hostile to further integration. But in 2012, the EU was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of how far Europe has put its blood-soaked past behind it.
In another sign of healing divisions, French President Francois Hollande will dedicate a memorial in November inscribed with the names of all 600,000 troops who perished in northern France during World War I, regardless of which side they fought on.
That seems to mirror a tendency to gloss over the question of who was to blame — many label Germany the chief aggressor — and focus instead on what happened, said Annika Mombauer, a historian at Britain's Open University. Such an approach sits uneasily with her.
“Given the countless victims the war claimed, the unimaginable horrors that were inflicted all over the world, it is fair and justified to pose the question of who was ultimately responsible for this,” she said. “Of course, we have not managed to agree on an answer in a hundred years, and doubtless we never will.
“The crisis of 1914 shows us that it is dangerous to be too complacent, to assume that bluff will work and that the other side will not ultimately be prepared to go to war,” Mombauer said. “The decision-makers of Austria-Hungary and Germany deliberately took the risk that the crisis they provoked might escalate into a full-scale war. The other governments were prepared to call their bluff.”
The Great War underscored the rise of the United States and the dawn of an American century. The principle of self-determination of nations took root, which continues to be tested. Three months from now, Scotland will vote on independence from Britain; Catalonia seeks a similar referendum on secession from Spain.
The war was a family affair: King George V of Britain, Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany and Czar Nicholas II of Russia were cousins. The war swept away most of those dynasties.
The Russian Revolution ushered in the first communist state; a defeated Germany witnessed the birth of the Weimar Republic. The Ottoman Empire was broken into pieces, and the map of the Middle East was redrawn. “The Great War ... was a rupture,” Van Rompuy said. “This is the end of yesterday's world, the end of empires, aristocracies and also an innocent belief in progress.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Violence spreads to Gaza Strip
- ‘Post-Ebola syndrome’ hospitalizes British nurse
- Backlash against Merkel over migrant flow grows
- Nobel Peace Prize goes to Tunisia groups united to foster political diaglogue
- Number of deaths attributed to smoking in China could hit 2 million by 2030
- Tunisian democracy group wins Nobel Peace Prize
- Abbas appeals for end to chaos with Israel
- Cameron in throes of leave-the-EU movement in Britain
- Svetlana Alexievich of Belarus wins Nobel literature prize
- EU hardens stance on immigration
- Head of huge Lenin statue unearthed near Berlin