British PM's ex-aide will be tried again
LONDON, ENGLAND - JUNE 30: Andy Coulson arrives at at Old Bailey for a Re-Trial decision on phone hacking charges on June 30, 2014 in London, England. Andy Coulson, former editor of the News of the World, returns to court to find out whether he will face a retrial over two charges of conspiracy to bribe public officials. (Photo by Stuart C. Wilson/Getty Images)
Photo by Getty Images
LONDON — British Prime Minister David Cameron's ex-media chief Andy Coulson, found guilty last week of phone-hacking while editing a Rupert Murdoch tabloid, will stand trial for a second time over alleged illegal payments, prosecutors said on Monday.
Coulson was convicted by a jury of being complicit in widespread tapping of voicemails by journalists at Murdoch's defunct News of the World Sunday tabloid after an eight-month trial.
However, the jury was unable to reach a verdict on whether Coulson and the paper's former royal editor, Clive Goodman, were guilty of making illegal payments to a police officer to obtain telephone directories for Britain's royal family. They denied the accusations.
Rebekah Brooks, the ex-chief executive of News Corp.'s British newspaper arm News International who was tried on phone-hacking allegations and other crimes, was cleared on all charges.
The announcement of the retrial was made as Coulson and three other senior journalists appeared in court for a sentencing hearing.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.