Share This Page

Afghan candidate pre-emptively rejects election results, alleges fraud in runoff vote

| Monday, July 7, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

KABUL, Afghanistan — Afghan presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah has pre-emptively rejected the results of last month's election, set to be officially released on Monday, saying the country's electoral commission was involved in widespread fraud that tarnished the legitimacy of the runoff vote.

“Unless the clean votes are separated from those that are fraudulent, we will not accept the election results,” Abdullah said in a televised news conference on Sunday night.

“We will refer to the people” on how to respond to the announcement on Monday, he said.

The stakes are high for a peaceful transfer of power, which would mark the first since the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. The fragile government here continues to battle a nationwide Taliban insurgency as foreign troops prepare to withdraw by the end of the year.

Abdullah's statement was made amid heightened concerns that the election outcome could plunge Afghanistan into further violence, possibly along ethnic lines. Abdullah, a former foreign minister who fought against Soviet forces, is of Tajik and Pashtun ethnicity. But he has been more associated with his mother's Tajik heritage, and Tajik communities have shored up support for his candidacy. His rival, former Finance Minister Ashraf Ghani, is a Pashtun who commands widespread support among the Pashtun populations in the country's southern and eastern regions.

Abdullah's campaign has called for a far-reaching recount of votes in several provinces where Ghani's support is strong and where it says election officials rigged ballot boxes in favor of Ghani. Two weeks ago, Abdullah played recorded telephone conversations allegedly of Amarkhil encouraging election officials to support Ghani and possibly encouraging ballot stuffing. The authenticity of the recordings could not be verified. Amarkhil denied wrongdoing but resigned “for the good of the country.'

Abdullah says releasing results, which according to leaked figures show Ghani in the lead, before fraudulent votes are removed from the tally is dangerous and will mislead the country.

The Independent Electoral Commission has agreed to audit 1,930 boxes where tallies showed voter turnout at 100 percent. Ghani — who trailed Abdullah after the first round in April but now stands to win — says his campaign engaged in grass-roots mobilization that got voters out in even the most violent and isolated districts.

“One thing is clear: The level of fraud is very high,” senior Abdullah adviser Mahmoud Saikal.

For that reason, “tomorrow's announcement does not mean much to us,” he said. “We will pursue what we want to pursue, and differentiate between the clean and fraudulent votes.”

Saikal said representatives from both campaigns met on Sunday. He said no political deals were on the table and that discussions focused on initiating a more comprehensive recount.

“Neither side can form a strong government unless they share power with the other,” said Khalil Roman, a Kabul-based political analyst and former deputy chief of staff to President Hamid Karzai. “Afghanistan is facing tremendous internal and external threats. They have to form a coalition in order to face these threats.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.