Another parliament delay deepens chaos in Iraq
BAGHDAD — Iraq's parliament stalled on Monday for a second time, canceling its planned session on Tuesday to give the country's deeply divided political factions time to reach an agreement on an urgently needed government.
The delay further imperils Baghdad's ability to keep the oil-rich country intact a month as al-Qaida-inspired militants seized much of Iraq's north and west, spurring the partial collapse of the nation's armed forces.
The militants, who call themselves the Islamic State, have declared an Islamic caliphate in that territory and have vowed to press on toward Baghdad.
Amid the chaos, Iraq's Kurdish minority has threatened to hold a referendum on independence for its largely autonomous region in the north.
The parliament said it would delay its next session until Aug. 12, “given the circumstances facing the country.”
“We're looking at a dire situation on the ground, which is why it's so important that things move forward urgently on the ground,” State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said in Washington in reaction to the delay.
The acting speaker said later that the lawmakers are likely to meet sooner — on Sunday — but that an official announcement of that change would not occur until Tuesday, the Associated Press reported.
Opposition to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite who Sunni Arabs and Kurds say has marginalized them in favor of sectarian policies, has forced a deadlock over the selection of a new leadership.
A senior Iraqi general was killed in fighting with insurgents near Baghdad.
Maj. Gen. Negm Abdullah Ali, commander of the army's Sixth Division, responsible for defending part of Baghdad, was killed 10 miles northwest of the capital.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.