Newly elected Libyan lawmakers meet amid chaos
BENGHAZI, Libya — More than three-quarters of Libya's newly elected parliament met for the first time on Saturday in a city chosen by a prominent anti-Islamist politician, likely signaling a swing against Islamists and extremist militias amid violence not encountered since the 2011 civil war that toppled dictator Moammar Gadhafi.
The lawmakers met in Tobruk, the site of a World War II battle, as rival militias battled for control over the international airport in the capital, Tripoli, with their fire setting more oil depots ablaze. Meanwhile in Libya's second-largest city of Benghazi, forces loyal to a renegade general were dealt a heavy blow when the Islamist militias overran several army bases and took control of the city.
The violence, which has killed more than 200 and wounded nearly 900 in weeks of fighting, has sent diplomats, thousands of foreign workers and Libyans fleeing for their lives and presents the greatest challenge for a country still largely at war with itself.
Abu Bakr Baiera — the anti-Islamist lawmaker who presided over the gathering of 152 lawmakers in Tobruk, a city in eastern Libya near the Egyptian border — decided to postpone the official opening until more lawmakers arrive.
The presence of that many members of parliament, all elected as independents, suggests most lawmakers are not affiliated to the Islamist factions that dominated Libya's outgoing interim parliament or support the Islamic extremist-led militia campaigns in Tripoli or Benghazi. The last session suffered from political infighting as well as violent attacks in which lawmakers were kidnapped and parliament itself besieged.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.