British PM urges NATO overhaul as hedge against Russia
Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron leaves Downing Street in London July 31, 2014.
Photo by Reuters
LONDON — NATO must overhaul itself to be able to better defend its members from a potential Russian military threat, British Prime Minister David Cameron said on Saturday.
In a letter to alliance leaders, Cameron said it is clear that Russia views NATO as an adversary.
Cameron said that the world is more unpredictable because “Russia has ripped up the rulebook with its illegal annexation of Crimea and aggressive destabilization of Ukraine.”
“We must accept that the cooperation of recent years is not currently possible because of Russia's own illegal actions in NATO's neighborhood and revisit the principles that guide our relationship with Russia,” Cameron said.
A report by British lawmakers on Thursday accused NATO of being complacent about the threat that Russia posed. It said Baltic states Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia — all ex-Soviet republics once ruled from Moscow — are particularly vulnerable.
In response, NATO said it was considering reinforcement measures and had acknowledged the need to adapt to a changed security environment.
In six weeks, a NATO summit will be held in Wales, the first such meeting in Britain since Margaret Thatcher hosted the alliance in 1990 as the Cold War was coming to a close.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.