Share This Page

Jihadists taunting Americans while experts say attack threat is real

| Monday, Aug. 11, 2014, 11:48 p.m.
Twitter
Security officials in the United States and Europe are worried about blowback from Western jihadis returning home to attack, a University of Pittsburgh terror expert says. Tweets from the frontlines show these American and European fighters taunting the U.S. since bombing over northern Iraq started. An expert at the Middle East Media Research Institute agrees the threat is real.
Twitter
Security officials in the United States and Europe are worried about blowback from Western jihadis returning home to attack, a University of Pittsburgh terror expert says. Tweets from the frontlines show these American and European fighters taunting the U.S. since bombing over northern Iraq started. An expert at the Middle East Media Research Institute agrees the threat is real.

One British fighter mockingly says he was so upset about American bombing raids on jihadists like himself in northern Iraq that he took a selfie while buying Nutella to “comfort my brittle heart.”

Another jihadist, dressed in black, posed for a photo with a young boy dressed likewise, adding a hashtag about swapping PlayStation video games for a real gun. Others posted images of American equipment left behind in Iraq, inviting troops to return.

Online taunts might seem glib, but fighters with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria — or now simply the Islamic State — have a growing desire to strike in the United States and Europe as a result of bombing to support Kurdish fighters, security experts told the Tribune-Review.

The question remains whether these terrorists actually can bring the fight to Western countries.

“The more that we get involved directly militarily, the more we become a crying call for the ISIS militants and insurgents,” said Michael Kenney, a terrorism expert at the University of Pittsburgh's Graduate School of Public and International Affairs. “They are currently trying to goad us into the fight ... because for them that's a great propaganda victory.”

Militants have recruited hundreds of Europeans and, perhaps, dozens of Americans to train and fight in Syria and Iraq, experts said.

Moner Mohammad Abu-Salha, 22, the first American suicide bomber known to carry out an attack in Syria, grew up in Vero Beach, Fla., and returned to the United States after his training before ultimately carrying out his May truck bomb attack overseas.

He could have attempted an attack in the United States instead, said Colin Clarke, a warfare researcher with Rand Corporation in Pittsburgh. Insurgents likely will want to attempt a spectacular assault aimed at Western transportation or infrastructure, he said.

It is easier, Clarke said, for insurgents to work their way back into European capitals over land than to come into the United States by airplane.

However, the possibility of flying into Mexico and coming by land across the problematic Southwest border cannot be overlooked.

“The will is certainly there,” Clarke said. “We're just not sure what the capability looks like. Especially with this increased United States involvement ... there's got to be a move at some point to show they have the capability to use these Westerners they have recruited in droves.”

Officials at the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI and other intelligence agencies are working to identify Americans who have gone overseas to train before they can sneak back into the country, a senior administration official told the Trib on background.

“DHS continues to be very focused on foreign terrorist fighters heading to certain countries in the Middle East and attempting to return to Western Europe or the United States,” the official said.

FBI Director James Comey said in Dallas on Monday that Americans fighting in Syria pose an urgent threat to the United States. The agency does not have “high confidence” in knowing just how many there are “because it's so hard to track,” he said.

Many of the Western fighters of jihad, or holy war, have Twitter accounts. Their taunts and threats aimed at the United States have increased since the Iraqi bombing started on Friday.

Over the weekend, fighters started using the hashtags #watchyourbackUSA in English and #Obama_announces_bombing_Islamic_State in Arabic. One tweet appeared to show someone holding a cellphone with a pro-Islamic State message standing outside of the White House.

A lot of the messages are pure hype, but security officials have to pay attention to the fighters' intent — especially in Europe, said Steven Stalinsky, executive director of The Middle East Media Research Institute, a Washington group that tracks terrorist propaganda.

“There's definitely a threat,” Stalinsky said. “I would say the European threat is much more serious, but you have to take the threat of Americans coming back seriously.”

A key question will be whether fighters abide by the “covenant of security” — an Islamic ruling that forbids attacking civilians where the fighters live — or not, Kenney said.

“That's kind of the $10,000 question,” Kenney said. “A lot of Americans and Europeans have gone over to these foreign theaters in the past ... and they came back, went back to their home countries and did absolutely nothing.”

Andrew Conte is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7835 or andrewconte@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.