ShareThis Page

Study examines sewage line upgrades

| Saturday, June 18, 2011, 12:00 p.m.

Significant repairs to aging sewage lines across the region would prevent waste from bubbling up on private property and the region's waterways -- as often occurs in hard rains or snowmelts.

Officials attending the third annual Congress of Neighboring Communities on Friday in Oakland released a study examining how to operate, manage and upgrade 18 sewage lines that serve multiple communities.

The lines, known as "trunks," connect sewers from 22 communities -- including Crafton, Edgewood, Penn Hills, Ross and Wilkinsburg -- and have a direct-flow connection to the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority and the Allegheny County Sanitary Authority, which provide sewage treatment for nearly a million people in the county.

Officials said ALCOSAN will perform its own broader study during the next 18 months.

The regional undertaking will be significant, said Jerry Brown, municipal support manager with the nonprofit group 3 Rivers Wet Weather, which gave CONNECT a $95,000 grant to complete the study.

"It could be one of the largest public works projects undertaken in this region," Brown said.

A long-standing consent decree from the state Department of Environmental Protection orders communities to eliminate or significantly reduce the amount of sewage flowing into streams, creeks and rivers.

The study's co-author, attorney Jim Roberts of the Eckert Seamans law firm, Downtown, said municipal officials must figure out equitable ways to pay for the maintenance and repairs since some of the current agreements between communities, dating to 1911, are based on outdated population figures or don't include provisions for future maintenance.

There are various ways to pay for the improvements, including issuing a municipal bond, adding a fee to water bills or levying a tax on residents, said Roberts, who also co-chairs the Act 47 Team overseeing Pittsburgh's finances.

"No matter which option is selected, you've got to finance them," Roberts said.

Chris Sandvig, regional policy manager for the Pittsburgh Community Reinvestment Group, a coalition of community leaders, said the cost for studies and repairs for the entire region was estimated at about $3 billion in 1997.

"Think about that today. It's unbelievable," Sandvig said. "It's putting some communities quite literally under water."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.