ShareThis Page

Connellsville Area to absorb additional pension costs into budget

| Monday, April 19, 2010

Next year, the state will require school districts to contribute between 8 and 8.5 percent of its payroll to pensions, up from the current 4 percent. The state sets the rate for each district and tells the districts how much to contribute.

In the Connellsville Area School District, this will represent about $3 million of the district's budget. This year, pensions cost taxpayers $1.5 million of the $66.47 million budget.

Connellsville's superintendent, Dr. David Goodin, said, "We're going to absorb it into the budget, by cutting the pie differently or by cutting expenditures." The increases will continue. "Down the road, it will double a couple of times. It looks like it will be doubling each year up to 20 percent."

Taxpayers across the United States owe public school teacher retirement accounts about $933 billion, nearly triple the amount reported by the plans themselves, a study says.

The $332 billion gap estimated by teacher retirement funds between what they have on hand and the cost of promised benefits is low because it includes an "aggressive" 8 percent assumption on future investment earnings, the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research said in the study released last week. It also doesn't reflect the full cost of stock market losses suffered in the past two years, the New York-based research organization said.

The report, covering 59 plans for 13 million working and retired educators, found that California had the largest unfunded teacher pension liability at almost $100 billion, more than the $42.6 billion reported by the system in January. It's the third study in less than two months to suggest that pension costs of about $1 trillion threaten to overwhelm state and local budgets already crimped by declining tax revenue.

Pennsylvania hasn't paid the recommended annual amount to its school and state employee pension funds in years, and won't for at least another decade if lawmakers adopt a budget proposal designed to spread costs into the future.

Pennsylvania increased benefits for state and school employees and lawmakers in 2001, added a cost-of-living raise for retirees in 2002, and then reduced contributions to the funds and spread costs out over a decade to soften the blow of market declines.

The two-year-old recession has left two-thirds of U.S. public retirement systems with assets worth less than 80 percent of future obligations, a level the Government Accountability Office has said is acceptable, the Center for State and Local Government Excellence said this month.

The institute recommended abandoning traditional defined- benefit pensions for new teachers in favor of 401(k)-style defined-contribution plans. It also urged public systems to adopt the same standards used by private companies.

Of the current school pension plan, Connellsville Area School District Superintendent Dr. David Goodin said, "It's a great pension, but not too many folks have a defined pension plan."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.