A Scottdale woman is facing charges of robbery and retail theft after she almost hit a Kmart store employee with her car.
Tiffany Gemas, 23, of 407 S. Broadway Ave., was charged with robbery with inflicting threat of immediate bodily injury, receiving stolen property and retail theft at District Court 10-3-10 on Oct. 3.
According to an affidavit of probable cause, the charges stemmed from an incident on Sept. 21 in which employees of Kmart in East Huntingdon saw Gemas allegedly leave the store with two Steelers bags with CD-ROM video games inside -- a total value of $1,897.89.
An employee pursued her outside the store into the parking lot, and Gemas got into a green 1998 Plymouth Neon.
The employee attempted to retrieve the stolen merchandise that had been placed on the front passenger seat through the lowered front passenger window.
The employee was partially inside the vehicle when Gemas began moving the vehicle.
One of the Steelers bags was recovered after being dropped by Gemas as she ran to her vehicle.
Trooper Matthew Pergar of the state police at Greensburg spoke with Gemas and she denied any knowledge of the incident; he then returned to Kmart where he gave a description of Gemas to the employees, who told him that description fit the woman.
Store security footage showed Gemas was in the store on Sept. 17 and Sept. 21.
On Sept. 30, Gemas confessed to stealing the merchandise, adding that she would disguise herself by wearing a wig and selling the merchandise on the street.
The total amount stolen was $3,729.31.
A preliminary hearing has been scheduled at 9:45 a.m. Oct. 12 at District Court 10-3-10.
Gemas is free on $10,000 bond.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.