Uniontown man charged with attempted robbery of gas station
By Mark Hofmann
Published: Saturday, March 10, 2012
A Uniontown man has been charged with the attempted robbery of a Connellsville gas station, one of three cases police are investigating.
Steven Vincent Campbell, 37, of 41 Shady Lane allegedly entered Reddy's Sunoco along Memorial Boulevard at 9:11 p.m. Thursday wearing a black coat and a black cap over his face. He showed a handgun and demanded money from the clerk, police said.
"The clerk refused and told him to leave," said city police Chief James Capitos. Campbell removed his hood as he left the store and walked toward York Avenue, Capitos said. The clerk called 911 and provided a description.
Connellsville police spotted Campbell, who matched the clerk's description, walking along Pittsburgh Street. As an officer approached Campbell and frisked him, police said, Campbell ran off and left behind his coat, in which a handgun was found. He was apprehended after being chased for three blocks.
Capitos said Campbell confessed.
The gun used in the holdup was a pellet gun that closely resembled a real pistol, police said.
Campbell was charged with robbery, aggravated assault, simple assault, terroristic threats, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct at District Judge Joseph George Jr.'s office. A preliminary hearing has been scheduled Thursday at District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr.'s office.
Campbell is in the Fayette County jail in lieu of $75,000 straight cash bond.
The incident on Thursday was the third time a robbery or attempted robbery occurred at Reddy's Sunoco since Feb. 4. Arrests were made in two of the cases; one is still under investigation.
Capitos said police don't believe the incidents are related.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.