ShareThis Page

Kittanning man arrested in drug deal bust

| Thursday, April 14, 2005

Two men from Western Pennsylvania are among nine people indicted by a federal grand jury in connection with a drug trafficking ring that has been operating for six years in the Northern Panhandle of West Virginia, U.S. Attorney Thomas E. Johnston said Wednesday.

Kirk A. Fair, 31, of the Kittanning area, was among the seven people who were arrested yesterday morning. Others named in the indictment are residents of Ohio and New York.

Elliot G. Nelson, 31, of Pittsburgh, was one of two people named in the indictment who remained at large last night, authorities said.

The ring is accused of distributing cocaine and crack cocaine in the Weirton and Chester areas of West Virginia and the Georgetown area of Beaver County.

Investigators recovered roughly $50,000 in crack cocaine and $15,000 in drug proceeds and began forfeiture proceedings to obtain an additional $150,000 in drug proceeds, three vehicles, two handguns and a safe.

The indictment states that Matthew Wolfe, 25, of Wellsville, and Corey Estes, 31, of East Liverpool, both Ohio, began obtaining and distributing the narcotics in April 1999.

Nelson and Fair were caught on Aug. 18, 2004, by officers near Chester who found them carrying drugs they obtained from Estes earlier in the day in Wellsville, the indictment states.

Michael Hasch is a staff writer for the Pittsburgh Tribune Review, Pittsburgh.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.