Armstrong County Jail commitments
The following people were committed to the Armstrong County Jail on Tuesday and Wednesday, according to jail records:
• Keith Allen Walker Sr., 41, of 88 Mitchell Road, West Middlesex, by the court, on a charge of driving under the influence.
• William Paul Ferguson, 27, of 315 S. Fourth St., Apollo, by the court, on a charge of driving under the influence.
• Robert Paul Lyle Jr., 24, of McKeesport, by the court, on a probation violation.
• Randilyn Jean Farster, 21, of 130 W. Market St., Timblin, by the court, on a bench warrant for failure to comply. She is also being held on unspecified criminal charges issued by District Judge Sam Goldstrohm.
• Gregory Benard Wilder Jr., 19, of 351 East Brady Road, Kittanning, by District Judge James Owen, on two counts of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, and one count each of criminal use of a communication facility, possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia and delivery of drug paraphernalia. He is being held on $15,000 bond.
• Amanda Joy Robinson, 29, of 341 N. Grant Ave., Kittanning, by District Judge James Owen, on possession of a controlled substance, possession with intent to deliver, and possession of drug paraphernalia. She is being held on $5,000 bond.
• Kenneth Lloyd Noble, 41, of 414 Piper Drive, Ford City, by the court, held for court. He is currently an inmate at the state prison at Pine Grove.
• Brandon Alan Stiteler, 23, of 849 Girty Road, Shelocta, by the court, held for court. He is currently an inmate at the state prison at Pine Grove.
• Charles Jacob Wensel Sr., 42, of 12139 Route 422, Kittanning, by the probation office, on a probation violation.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.