Accelerant found at Sirwell Street house fire in Kittanning
Kittanning police are investigating an arson that occurred at a Sirwell Street home just before 7 a.m. Tuesday.
Police said they have identified a "person of interest" in the fire that damaged a rear room, but declined to name him or her. Accelerant was found outside of the home yesterday afternoon by police and borough Fire Marshal Earl Kline.
"A neighbor got up to go to work and saw smoke," said police Chief Ed Cassesse.
The neighbor alerted resident Christopher Powell to the fire and Powell escaped with his dogs, said borough Officer Jamie Baum.
Kline said the fire started on the outside of the house and firefighters did a good job containing the blaze to the rear room, which contained a set of bunk beds.
"Nothing burned to the inside," he said.
In addition to the house fire, someone attempted to set a neighbor's car on fire by inserting a rag or paper towel in the gas tank, investigators said.
A steep hill from Sirwell Street leads to the rear of the house and firefighters did a "very good job" battling the blaze based on the conditions, Kline said. Crews from Kittanning Hose Companies 4 and 6 traveled the narrow street to the house while Hose Company 1 stayed near the intersection of Sirwell Street and Johnson Avenue, he said.
Rayburn and Kittanning Township fire departments assisted at the scene.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.