Indiana University of Pennsylvania has warned its faculty union of the possibility of layoffs as the state school looks at ways to reduce a projected $12 million shortfall in next year's budget, a union official said Thursday.
IUP officials discussed the possibility of "retrenchment of faculty and/or the furloughs of management and staff" earlier this week with Susan Drummond, president of the university's chapter of the Association of Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties, according to a news release issued yesterday by the union.
University officials told Drummond the school "will take every reasonable measure to avoid retrenchment and furloughs, but they may be unavoidable due to financial considerations, program curtailment, elimination of courses, and other reasons," the release stated.
"When (university) administration asked us to meet to discuss their projected $12 million deficit for 2011-12, I agreed on behalf of the APSCUF Meet and Discuss Team," Drummond said. "However, the management side was not as concerned about the budget or real solutions to the deficit as they were in using the meeting as an opportunity to inform us of possible retrenchment."
Drummond said increasing enrollments and faculty are the only real additional source of generating revenue through tuition dollars, making the idea of layoffs comparable to "killing the goose that lays the golden egg," the release stated.
The Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education -- of which IUP is a member along with 13 other schools -- has been cited as having the lowest tuition increases among state systems since 2005.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.