Review: Alonzo King's Lines Ballet bold, inventive
The dance offered by Alonzo King's Lines Ballet is incessantly exhilarating, filled with bold, broad gestures that are themselves full of intriguing nuance. At Friday night's performance of two of King's ballets at the August Wilson Center, Downtown, the word cool applied in several ways.
"Signs and Wonders" is a 26-minute piece set to traditional African music including the different appeals of children singing and drumming. Created in 1995 for Dance Theater of Harlem, its nine sections showcased the handsome company, which thrived on King's physically assertive style. But it wasn't until the penultimate section, the piece's second duet, that there was any warmth between the dancers.
"Refraction 2009" is set to a wonderful score by pianist Jason Moran, some of which had the cool sensitivity of some of Erik Satie's music, while his vibrant music had definite jazz elements and was inventive in its unfolding. King's choreography is inventive, including his styles of pointe work, and, in this piece, had more interaction.
If there was a sense of community to be conveyed by "Signs and Wonders" and "Refraction 2009," it is of a community of people doing their own things without much connection with each other. But there's no denying King's ballets are fun to watch.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.