Maintaining a lower assessment and getting a refund of tax payments could be in the works for Century III Mall in West Mifflin.
The Board of Viewers in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court held a hearing Thursday on the assessment for the 1.29-million-square-foot mall, which will apparently stand at $66 million. That assessment is a 40 percent reduction from the previous $112 million. Prior to that, the mall was valued at $128 million.
The mall has been plagued with vacant storefronts, restaurants and kiosks among about 130 operating businesses.
"We are awaiting for the Board of Viewers' verdict to be issued, which may take a week or more," said Jack Cambest, solicitor for the West Mifflin Area School District's board of directors.
The school district and borough had appealed the lower assessment to the board.
Cambest said the lower assessment applies to tax years 2006 through 2009.
All three taxing bodies, including Allegheny County, might have to make refunds to the mall, part of the Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group.
"There's a proposal for a settlement, but I did not commit the borough to anything," borough Solicitor Michael Adams said. "There are numbers on the table, but I have to take them back to the borough and present them."
There is an estimate that the refund could be as much as $1.5 million for each year.
"I heard it was a very significant amount of money," said West Mifflin Council President William Welsh Jr.
A spokesman for Simon Property Group declined to comment, saying the company doesn't comment on mall assessments. Century III Mall Manager Gina Mercorelli also declined to comment.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.