Nova Chemicals' CEO Pappas, CFO MacDonald to retire at end of year
Christopher Pappas, who became president and chief executive of chemicals and resin maker Nova Chemicals Corp. on May 1, will retire from the Moon-based company at yearend, Nova said Monday.
Pappas, a nine-year company veteran who previously served as Nova's chief operating officer, assumed control when former CEO Jeff Lipton formally retired. No successor was named.
Nova, which ran into financial difficulties over the last year due to plummeting plastic prices, was acquired July 6 by International Petroleum Investment Co., an investment company owned and operated by the government of the Middle East country Abu Dhabi. Purchase price was $500 million cash, plus assumption of $1.8 billion in debt.
"Chris has been an enormous support to Nova Chemicals and IPIC during the acquisition and transition period and we truly appreciate his expertise and leadership," said Mohamed Al Mehairi, Nova chairman and director of investments for International Petroleum Investment, in a statement.
Also retiring from Nova on Dec. 31 is Nova's chief financial officer, Larry A. MacDonald, after more than 30 years with the company and its predecessors. MacDonald was a member of the company's executive leadership team since its inception in 1998.
"On behalf of Nova Chemicals, I want to thank Larry for his dedication and many contributions to our company," Pappas said, in a statement. "We are fortunate to have had his financial expertise during these unique and dynamic economic times."
MacDonald will be replaced as CFO on Jan. 1, by another long-time Nova employee, Todd D. Karran, a 24-year company veteran.
Todd is a natural choice to move into the CFO role at Nova," Pappas said, in a statement. "He has the experience and capability to be successful in the role immediately."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.