Salk Hall to get $50.6 million makeover
Salk Hall on the University of Pittsburgh's Oakland campus will get a $50.6 million renovation and addition, officials said.
Included in the project will be construction of an 80,000-square-foot research tower in the parking area behind the existing building.
The building will house laboratories and support spaces, which would be relocated from Salk Hall. This will allow Pitt to renovate the empty space into classrooms and offices.
No date for the work was announced.
The action was approved last month by the University of Pittsburgh's Board of Trustees budget committee as part of $148 million in general construction projects.
The Salk project was first announced in May 2007 when the university released details of its 12-year master plan for its buildings.
Occupants of the building are the University's School of Pharmacy, which provides professional and graduate courses, and the School of Dental Medicine.
Originally known as Municipal Hospital, the building was acquired by Pitt from the city of Pittsburgh in 1957 for $1.3 million. Local foundations provided the funding.
During the period from 1949 to 1954, a Pitt research team assembled by Jonas Salk developed the first polio vaccine in the basement of the hospital.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.