Female-headed household here worse off, study finds
More than four of 10 families headed by single mothers in the Pittsburgh area live in poverty, according to a study released Thursday.
The Women and Girls Foundation of Southwest Pennsylvania, Downtown, commissioned the study to see how women in the Pittsburgh area and the state are faring during the recession versus men.
"The unemployment rate for single mothers has nearly doubled since 2007 in both the Pittsburgh and state level, and the unemployment rate for single mothers is two and a half times the unemployment rate for married men," said Heather Arnet, executive director.
The study, "The Female Face of Poverty and Economic Insecurity: The Impact of the Recession in Pennsylvania and Pittsburgh MSA," was performed by the Institute for Women's Policy Research in Washington.
The plight of female-headed households is worse here than the rest of the state, where one in three families headed by a woman lives in poverty.
The study also finds that women in the Pittsburgh area earn just 74.6 percent what men make and minority women make even less -- 64.2 percent for black females and 65.6 percent for Hispanic women. But women have made some progress, Arnet said. Five years ago, females in the region made only 70 cents on the dollar. She attributed the increase to greater awareness among corporate leaders and public officials and more training of women in the art of negotiation.
Arnet said, "We hope the data will lead decision makers to increase investments in women's work force development and training programs and require that projects receiving stimulus funds increase their benchmarks for female participation."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.