Giant Eagle, union OK pacts that give raises
Grocery store workers and meat cutters at 36 corporate-owned Giant Eagle Supermarket Inc. stores approved two new four-year labor contracts Friday that give them a $1.55-an-hour raise over four years, union officials said.
Members of United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 23 approved the agreements that cover about 5,800 workers at 34 Giant Eagle stores in Western Pennsylvania and two in West Virginia. The old contract expires today.
The contracts give union members a wage increase of 40 cents an hour in each of the first two years, then 35 cents an hour, followed by 40 cents an hour in the fourth year, said Anthony Helfer, president of UFCW Local 23 in Cecil. The union's bargaining committee had unanimously endorsed the settlement, which Giant Eagle and the union had reached on June 18.
While wage increases and benefits are similar for the grocery store workers and the meat cutters, there are separate issues for both groups, Helfer said. About 3,000 of the grocery store workers earn less than $9.30 an hour, and meat cutters earn about $17 an hour, he said.
In addition to health care and wage increases, Helfer said, Giant Eagle agreed to make a 43-cents-an-hour increase to its employee pension plan in the first year of the pact. The contract will cost the company $38.8 million in wages and benefits, spread over the next four years, he said.
Among workers who supported the pact, Ronald Jackson of McKeesport, who works at the Giant Eagle in Monroeville, said the agreement is a good deal, but he was hoping it would include paid medical benefits for retirees. Jackson, who has 40 years of service with Giant Eagle, said he could retire in about four years.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.