ShareThis Page

$136 million Alcoa profit outearns estimates

| Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Alcoa Inc. said Monday it made a second-quarter profit of $136 million, or 13 cents a share, due to stronger sales, improved productivity and lower energy costs.

The profit compares to a loss of $454 million, or 47 cents a share, for the same quarter a year ago,

New York-based Alcoa, the nation's largest aluminum producer, said its sales for the quarter that ended June 30 rose 6 percent to $5.18 billion, from $4.24 billion in second-quarter 2009. That rise in revenue was driven by a 4 percent increase in aluminum shipments and a 1 percent increase in third-party prices for alumina, which is used to produce aluminum.

Alcoa's second-quarter performance surpassed the prediction of some analysts, who said Alcoa would earn 11 cents a share, and hit the mark for others, who expected Alcoa to reach 13 cents a share.

Alcoa's prospects, and prospects for aluminum, continue to be excellent, CEO Klaus Kleinfeld said. The company's performance is strengthening despite the fact that metals use has been down in the sluggish economy, Kleinfeld said.

Alcoa, which has its corporate center on the North Shore, made money despite a drop of $22 per metric ton in the average price of aluminum on the market, to $2,309 a ton in the quarter.

The second-quarter results reflected the impact of the company's restructuring, which included about 13,500 job cuts worldwide last year and the additional cost of Alcoa's new labor contract with the United Steelworkers. The union represents more than 5,400 employees at 10 locations in the United States.

Signing bonuses for workers covered by the four-year labor agreement, plus work done in preparation for a possible strike, cost Alcoa $13 million in the second quarter, said Charles McLane, the company's chief financial officer.

Looking at the remainder of 2010, Kleinfeld told analysts during an earnings call yesterday that the biggest risk facing Alcoa is the volatility of the financial market, which is reflected in the swings in currency.

The company expects to benefit from the use of aerospace inventory, which will have to be restocked, Kleinfeld said.

Kleinfeld said he was not concerned that China will flood the market with aluminum because the aluminum business is energy-intensive, and energy is a scarce commodity in China.

"They need it (energy) for other things," Kleinfeld said.

Alcoa has about 1,600 employees in Western Pennsylvania, at its corporate center and its Alcoa Technology Center in Upper Burrell.

Alcoa's stock closed yesterday at $10.70 a share, down 7 cents, or 0.64 percent.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.