Federal meddling in natural gas spurned
The federal government should not impose more rules on the state's natural gas industry, a Pennsylvania congressman said on Tuesday.
The state Department of Environmental Protection already is responsible for overseeing the industry and federal intervention could slow growth, U.S. Rep. Bill Shuster told industry executives at a conference in Pittsburgh.
Shuster, R-Hollidaysburg, Blair County, said the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers wants to impose more regulations and another level of permitting on natural gas pipelines. More than 150 natural gas wells in the state cannot be put into production because federal permits for needed pipelines have not been issued.
An urgent need for safety upgrades and the booming Marcellus shale drilling industry make Western Pennsylvania a hot spot for pipeline work.
"They will shut them down," Shuster said, if the federal government is allowed to add more regulations. "The state DEP will (oversee the industry) in an environmentally sound way," he added. Shuster heads a House subcommittee on railroads, pipelines and hazardous materials.
An expanded pipeline system to transport natural gas from wells to compressors and processing stations is crucial to the development of the Marcellus gas reserves in the state, industry representatives said yesterday.
About 1,500 industry representatives attended Hart Energy's Marcellus Midstream Conference at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center.
Although five of the nation's seven largest gas pipelines run through Pennsylvania, the state does not have a system of transmission lines -- essentially the city streets of the pipeline system -- to get gas from the wells to the interstate pipeline system, Range Resources Inc. CEO John Pinkerton said.
Range Resources, which has 1.2 million acres of Marcellus reserves under lease in Pennsylvania, has been drilling wells in the state for 25 years, but without big results. Only recently has it been able to exploit those rich reserves because the wells had been "stranded" without a nearby pipeline system, Pinkerton said.
The Marcellus play is producing about 2.4 billion cubic feet of gas per day, and that's expected to increase by about 400 percent in the next nine years.
Range Resources has joined with MarkWest Energy Partners L.P. of Denver to serve as the midstream operator for its gas.
MarkWest CEO Frank Semple said the company already invested $800 million in the gasline infrastructure in Pennsylvania to deliver gas from Range wells to the Columbia Gas Co. system. It initially looked at investing $300 million to $400 million for the midstream system, Semple said.
MarkWest, which has an office in Cecil and about 100 employees, has built a processing plant in Houston, Washington County, and a gas-processing facility in Majorsville, W.Va., along with four gas plants that separate propane, butane and heavy natural gas from the natural gas it delivers to Columbia, Semple said.
"We're trying to build an industrial-strength system to service the (Marcellus) play," Semple said.
MarkWest announced it will join with Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. in Philadelphia to build a pipeline to deliver ethane liquid fuel from Marcellus reserves to MarkWest's gas-processing and fractionalization complex in Houston. It will be shipped to Ontario, Canada, through new and existing pipelines. The system would include the construction of a 25-mile pipeline from Houston to a Sunoco pipeline at Vanport.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.