Labor chief laments worker 'mismatch'
The "mismatch" between worker skills and those required for available jobs is perhaps the biggest challenge these days for industry and organized labor, Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis said in Pittsburgh on Tuesday.
"The jobs of today and the jobs of tomorrow will require worker training," she said. "Our long-term prosperity depends on training workers."
Solis spoke before about 250 people attending a forum, "Industry, Trades & Skills," at the Community College of Allegheny County's campus in the North Side.
Even with unemployment at 8.2 percent, there are 3 million jobs unfilled, Solis said. She and others on a panel of speakers emphasized science, technology, engineering and math, or STEM, education.
Solis said more than 400,000 Americans are enrolled in more than 20,000 worker training programs, including about 100 registered apprenticeship programs in Allegheny County. They lead to good-paying jobs, such as skilled welders and electricians, she said.
"Those jobs can't be outsourced to other countries," Solis said to hearty applause.
Peoples Natural Gas Co. CEO Morgan O'Brien, also on yesterday's panel, said one of his worries is the number of people who are retiring from the natural gas industry these days. They have valuable skills that are not being replenished by younger people fast enough, he said, especially given the opportunities in the region's growing Marcellus shale gas industry.
O'Brien said his company and other gas utilities in Western Pennsylvania will each need to hire "hundreds" of people in the next couple of years.
Solis recalled advising her younger sisters years ago to look into an engineering career, "and they looked at me like I was crazy," she said. "Now, one is a computer engineer, and the other is a chemical engineer."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.