ShareThis Page

So long, metrosexuals: Welcome to the Menaissance

| Sunday, May 23, 2010

Metrosexuals, take note: The party's over.

The man's man is back. And he's had enough of unisex salons, simpering emo music and the emasculating kryptonite of the Oprahsphere.

Or so say a spate of ads, books and websites that hail the emergence of the retrosexual, whose attitude and style hearken back to the strong, silent type of the '50s and early '60s.

The retrosexual keeps things simple. He does not own more hair and skin care products than his wife or girlfriend. He does not "accessorize."

Think Don Draper, the dapper, jut-jawed executive played by Jon Hamm in the AMC series "Mad Men." He may be a philanderer, but you won't find a pink shirt in his wardrobe. Like the dark hero characters of ex-spy Michael Westen in "Burn Notice" and U.S. Marshal Raylon Givens in "Justified," "Mad Men" presents alpha males who live unapologetically by their own code.

Draper embodies the same manly values outlined in Dave Besley's 2008 book, "The Retrosexual Manual: How to Be A Real Man" (Prion; $24.95). Draper deals with crises head on. He possesses resilience, a virtue that was the subject of a recent multipart dissertation on

This "menaissance," as one blogger called it, is old wine in a new bottle, says Gordon Coonfield, associate professor of communications at Villanova University.

"Actually, it is the result of clever marketing and not much more than that," he says. "That doesn't make it any less real for the people who take it up."

Indeed. Last fall, Brooks Brothers debuted the limited edition Mad Men Suit for $998, a two-button, thin-lapeled sharp gray number whose retro stylings recall the show's early '60s milieu. The suit quickly sold out.

A number of men's products have also capitalized on the trend. "Smell Like a Man, Man!" says a buff, shirtless dude on an Old Spice body wash commercial. And a Miller beer commercial features a model-pretty female bartender who puts down a male customer for carrying a purse.

Nancy Patrus, owner of the Middle Road Barbershop in Richland, bought the business in January. She intentionally kept it a guy sanctuary. With its Elvis and gas-station memorabilia, few would mistake it for a salon.

"I think they're being neglected," she says of guys. "There's many, many shops that cater to women. But the old-fashioned barbershop is gone, and I wanted to bring it back."

While it's obviously her business to groom men to look presentable, she thinks the metrosexual trend has gone too far. Why, for example, do guys feel the need to wax their chests•

"Younger men, unfortunately, feel the same pressure that women have felt," Patrus says. "Before, men were satisfied with just being men."

Susan Shaprio Barash, who teaches gender studies at Marymount Manhattan College, says the lingering recession has more women yearning for the reliability and stability of a bring-home-the-bacon kind of guy -- without the chauvinism.

"Since the downturn, because things are in shambles, women really want manly men," she says. "Just because there's this climate of insecurity, women really want strong men. That's why 'Mad Men' is so popular."

The flawed alpha males of "Mad Men" and "The Sopranos" are accepted in large part because of the writing on the shows is so good, says Brenton J. Malin, assistant professor of communication at the University of Pittsburgh, and the author of "American Masculinity Under Clinton" (Peter Lang Press, $29.95).

But their creators don't necessarily glorify them. "Mad Men," for example, is set in the antediluvian era just before the Kennedy assassination and the Beatles. Part of the irony is that Draper and his swaggering white male buddies are about to be knocked from their perch by the social upheavals of the '60s.

"The assumption was that they were commenting on masculinity and not just presenting it," Malin says. "They 're celebrating it in certain ways, but they're critiquing it in certain ways."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.