Judge eliminates Pittsburgh's 'Next Great Baker'
Pittsburgh paramedic Megan Hart won't be the "Next Great Baker" after all, but she's not giving up baking.
Hart, 38, of Lincoln Place was eliminated on this week's episode of TLC's "Next Great Baker" after part of the cake she was working on with two other contestants collapsed.
The competition, which began filming in August, started out with 13 contestants. With the elimination of Hart and another baker, Carmelo Oquendo, on this week's show, there are four bakers left. The show is a spinoff of "Cake Boss," and is judged by that show's star, Buddy Valestro. The winner will get $100,000, a four-page feature in Brides magazine, and a chance to work with Valestro and his team at Carlo's Bakery.
During Monday's show, the bakers were split into two teams of three to make a Heavy Metal Birthday Cake for Valestro's right-hand man and brother-in-law, Mauro Castano. Valestro was not impressed by either cake, leading him to eliminate two bakers.
The cake that Hart worked on had four layers and half of a guitar rising from the top. On the way to deliver the cake, the guitar fell off.
In a video blog she made after the elimination, Hart said she is starting on Feb. 1 as a cake designer for Dozen Bake Shop in Lawrenceville.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.