ShareThis Page

Stenting as effective as surgery, study finds

| Wednesday, May 26, 2010

A less-invasive stenting procedure to open blocked neck arteries is just as safe and effective as traditional surgery, according to a large clinical trial conducted in part at Allegheny General Hospital in the North Side.

"Each option has its pros and cons. This study shows roughly equivalent results from both procedures," said Dr. Satish Muluk, chief of vascular surgery at AGH.

Muluk was one of the principal investigators in the study, known as the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial, or CREST. Results were published Wednesday in the online edition of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Carotid stenting, less common than surgery, involves the insertion of a mesh-like tube into the neck artery through the groin. The tube expands inside the artery to increase blood flow that was impaired by plaque.

The study found that stenting came with a slightly higher risk of stroke for the 2,502 participants at 116 centers in the United States and Canada.

Patients who underwent the surgical option known as endarterectomy also had risks. The study found a higher percentage of participants suffered heart attacks after the surgery, compared with those in the stenting group.

Surgery has been the standard for removing plaque from the carotid artery. It requires anesthesia and an incision in the neck.

"One has to be very careful in choosing a procedure, depending on the patient," Muluk said. "If a patient has a tenuous heart condition, maybe they are at risk for a heart attack, and that patient should be treated with stenting."

Choosing one treatment over another should be done in consultation with a physician familiar with both techniques, Muluk said. Despite higher risks for stroke with stenting, he said, doctors use an umbrella-type device to catch plaque that might be released during the procedure.

Carotid artery disease is a leading cause of strokes, which kill almost 800,000 Americans every year. The disease develops when there is blockage in one of the two arteries that travel along the front of the neck and supply blood to the brain.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.