The brewing kettles cooked at the City Brewery in Latrobe for the first time in about one year Monday, the first step in an four-week process before the first batch of Samuel Adams beer will flow into kegs.
The former Latrobe Brewing Co. plant, which churned out Rolling Rock beer for more than six decades, will soon produce about 2,000 half barrels of Samuel Adams beer daily, said Kevin Morgan, plant manager for LaCrosse, Wis.-based City Brewing Co.
Boston Beer Co., brewer of Samuel Adams beers, signed a deal with plant owner City Brewing Co. in April to brew its products. Boston Beer said it planned to invest $3 million to $7 million to upgrade the plant in Latrobe, Westmoreland County, to accomodate its brewing processes, proprietary yeasts and extended aging time of its beer.
Massachusetts-based Boston Beer produces about 21 different styles of beer under the Samuel Adams line.
Morgan said the plant currently employs about 45 workers, and expects to add more in the first week of June when the plant's bottling line is running. He said the plant expects to produce about 200,000 to 250,000 barrels of Samuel Adams beer through the rest of this year.
Morgan added the plant will soon be able to do "blending and batching," which allows for the production of other alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages.
In May 2006, InBev USA, a division of Belgian brewing giant InBev NA, sold the Latrobe Brewing Co. name and its Rolling Rock and Rock Green Light brands to Anheuser-Busch Cos. for $82 million. In September, City Brewing completed its acquisition of the Latrobe plant. Terms were not disclosed.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.