ShareThis Page

Pens' Crosby wins Pearson Award

| Thursday, June 14, 2007

TORONTO - Sidney Crosby won the Lester B. Pearson Award as most valuable players according to the NHL's players association at the league's awards show, Thursday night. It is the first Pearson Award for Crosby, who earlier in the day was named a first-team All-Star.

Crosby was presented the award by Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

At 19, Crosby is the youngest Pearson Award winner in league history. He beat out Tampa center Vincent Lecavalier and Vancouver goaltender Roberto Luongo for the Pearson.

"To be recognized like this by the guys you play against each night is really an honor," said Crosby, who thanked teammates, coaches, his family and Penguins fans.

Crosby is also a finalist for the Hart Trophy, which is presented to the most valuable player to his team as voted on by the Professional Hockey Writers Association.

The last Penguins' player to win the Pearson Award was Jaromir Jagr in 2000. Jagr was also the last Penguin to win the Hart, doing so in 1999.

Other Penguins up for awards are centers Jordan Staal and Evgeni Malkin, who are finalist for the Calder Trophy presented to the most outstanding rookie, and Michel Therrien, who is a finalist for the Jack Adams Award that goes to the outstanding coach.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.