CMU makes the cut for robotic development
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency announced today that Carnegie Mellon University's Tartan Racing team and 35 other teams worldwide are semifinalists to compete for $2 million in the secretive government-sponsored Urban Challenge.
The challenge -- meant to spur robotic development -- will pit autonomous vehicles against one another on Nov. 3rd to see which can best navigate roads in an urban military training facility without human help.
Carnegie Mellon is entering "Boss," a Chevy Tahoe named for General Motors Research founder Charles F. "Boss" Kettering, in the competition.
DARPA also announced that the former George Air Force Base in Victorville, Calif., would be the site of the challenge.
"The robotic vehicles will conduct simulated military supply missions at the site," said Tony Tether, director of DARPA. "This adds many of the elements these vehicles would face in operational environments."
The semifinalists will compete in a final qualifying round at the site on October 26th and be whittled down to 20 teams.
Those teams' vehicles will have to perform like cars with drivers to safely conduct a simulated battlefield supply mission on a 60-mile urban course, obeying California traffic laws while merging into traffic, navigating traffic circles and avoiding obstacles -- all in fewer than six hours. The team to successfully complete the mission with the fastest time wins.
"Technology from the Urban Challenge is destined to change the driving experience," said William "Red" Whittaker, Tartan Racing team leader and robotics professor at Carnegie Mellon.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.