ShareThis Page

Pens sign Dupuis, Eaton; lose Conklin, Hall

| Tuesday, July 1, 2008

The Penguins entered today with 10 unrestricted free agents.

Four hours into the free-agent signing period, that number stands at six.

Forward Pascal Dupuis and defenseman Mark Eaton have signed multi-year contracts with the Penguins. Dupuis inked a three-year deal totaling $4.2 million and Eaton signed at two years for a total of $2 million.

The Penguins also reportedly have signed forward Eric Godard, who spent the past two seasons with Calgary. Canada's TSN reports the deal is worth three years, with financial details unknown.

Godard could provide the Penguins insurance as an enforcer if they cannot sign right wing Georges Laraque, who has not received an offer from general manager Ray Shero.

Ty Conklin, a veteran goaltender credited by many Penguins' players for saving the team's season, has signed a one-year deal worth $750,000 with the Detroit Red Wings. Conklin went 18-8-5 with a 2.51 goals-against average and a .923 save percentage -- second best in the NHL -- after a recall from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton of the AHL in early-December.

Adam Hall, who spent the entire season with the Penguins after earning a roster spot out of training camp, has signed a three-year deal worth $1.8 million with Tampa Bay.

The Penguins are also believed to have reached an agreement with star center Evgeni Malkin on a five-year contract extension worth $8.7 million annually. That extension will kick in after this season. An announcement is expected this week.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.