ShareThis Page

Beaver County Dems make pick in Senate race

| Friday, Aug. 15, 2008

Beaver County Democrats on Thursday night endorsed county Commissioner Joe Spanik as their choice as nominee in the 47th Senatorial District race to replace retiring Sen. Gerald LaValle, D-Rochester.

The party must fill the slot that opened when state Rep. Sean Ramaley, D-Economy, dropped out of the race earlier this month. Ramaley and 11 others face criminal charges related to the legislative corruption scandal involving bonuses.

The 47th district includes most of Beaver County, part of Lawrence County and a slice of Allegheny County.

On Wednesday, Lawrence County Democrats unanimously picked Jason Petrella of Monaca to be the nominee. Ramaley defeated Petrella in the April primary, 53 to 47 percent.

Democratic officials in Allegheny County are scheduled to vote on a potential nominee Monday.

Beaver County Democratic Chairman Michael Sisk said the Democratic State Committee will make the final decision since Beaver and Lawrence selected different candidates.

Spanik, of Center, also was a candidate in the Democratic primary but withdrew after Ramaley got the party endorsement.

Other Democrats in contention for the nomination included Bob Grotevant of Brighton Township, a regional director for the state Treasury Department who was an aide to the late Gov. Bob Casey Sr.; Anthony Razzano, a certified public accountant from Union Township; and Stevan Drobac Jr., a retired Center police officer. Economy Mayor David Poling had sought the nomination but withdrew earlier this week.

The Democratic nominee will face Republican Elder Vogel Jr., a New Sewickley Township supervisor, in the Nov. 4 election. Jay Paisley, a former Democrat, planned to run for the Senate post as an independent, but Paisley fell short of the number of petition signatures required to get on the ballot as an independent.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.