ShareThis Page

Steelers get to 53-man limit

| Saturday, Aug. 30, 2008

Wide receiver Willie Reid, return specialist Eddie Drummond, punter Paul Ernster and defensive end Ryan McBean were among the players the Steelers cut today while the team placed quarterback Charlie Batch on injured reserve ending his season and possibly career in Pittsburgh.

Two of the Steelers draft choices from this year, linebacker Mike Humpal and safety Ryan Mundy were waived and given injury settlements as was veteran linebacker Arnold Harrison as the team pared its roster to 53 players.

Reid, a third-round pick in 2006, may have been the most significant of the 22 roster moves the Steelers made today to get to the 53-man limit allowed by the NFL. He led the Steelers with nine receptions in four preseason games but averaged just nine yards a catch and didn't figure into the team's plans as a returner.

Batch is still recovering from a broken collarbone, and the Steelers elected to go with Byron Leftwich as Ben Roethlisberger's backup and rookie Dennis Dixon as the No. 3 quarterback.

Other players cut today were linebacker Patrick Bailey, fullback Billy Latsko, guards Doug Legursky and Matt Lentz, defensive back Roy Lewis, safety Grant Mason, offensive tackle Jeremy Parquet, defensive tackle Scott Paxson, defensive end Jordan Reffett, wide receiver Micah Rucker, tight ends Dezmond Sherrod and Lee Vickers, running back Justin Vincent and cornerback Travis Williams.

The Steelers only have two tight ends on their 53-man roster.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.