Creighton workers rejects PPG contract extension
Union workers at PPG Industries' Creighton auto glass plant on Saturday rejected a 3-year contract extension from the company.
In an e-mailed statement, the company said it was "disappointed" with the vote.
PPG is negotiating to sell the plant, located in East Deer, to the private equity firm Kohlberg & Co. LLC., of Mt. Kisco, N.Y., for $330 million.
A number of United Steel Workers Local 12-G members, who declined to be identified, said after the vote that they were told a Sept. 30 sale closing date has been proposed.
In December, a proposed $500 million sale of the plant and other assets failed and ended with a federal lawsuit.
Local 12-G's leadership on Saturday declined comment about the vote or the possible sale. Union officials would not give a vote tally.
The union represents about 180 PPG Creighton workers.
In the e-mail statement, PPG corporate said it is "disappointed that production and maintenance employees at its Creighton automotive plant have rejected it's final offer for a new labor agreement that would have run through June of 2012.
"Early negotiations with Local 12-G of the United Steelworkers were prompted due to the declining U.S. automotive market that is served by the plant.
"The current labor agreement is set to expire in March of 2009. The new agreement would have been a significant step towards ensuring the economic viability of the facility during this very challenging time for the U.S. automotive industry."
Under the proposal, PPG would retain a 40 percent interest in the plant and the new joint entity, which would be known as Pittsburgh Glass Works, would have a separate headquarters, according to published reports.
Also, the proposed sale would involve PPG selling its auto glass plants in Tipton, Blair County, and Meadville, Crawford County.
PPG employs about 4,400 in nine automotive glass manufacturing plants and related facilities. The plants make original equipment and replacement windows.
It's unclear if PPG will make another offer to the bargaining unit or if the union will offer a counter-proposal.
It's also unclear if the proposal would impact PPG's research and development lab at Harmar.
Local 12-G president Karla Grant, vice president Kent Crytzer and USW District 10 representative James Watt refused on Saturday to comment about the vote or what PPG is proposing.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.