ShareThis Page

Wannstedt: Cavanaugh, Stull won't lose jobs

Kevin Gorman
| Monday, Jan. 5, 2009

Pitt football coach Dave Wannstedt today said that, despite their performances in a 3-0 loss to Oregon State in the Brut Sun Bowl, offensive coordinator Matt Cavanaugh will return in the same role next season and senior Bill Stull will enter spring drills as the starting quarterback.

Wannstedt also said via a telephone conference call that he expects star tailback LeSean McCoy, who rushed for 1,488 yards and 21 touchdowns this season, to bypass the NFL Draft and return for his junior season.

Wannstedt took exception to criticism of Cavanaugh, in particular, after the Panthers totaled 178 yards against an Oregon State defense that allowed 640 to Oregon in its season finale. Wannstedt noted that Pitt finished the regular season as the Big East's top scoring offense and No. 2 red-zone offense, and bristled when asked if the Panthers needed a new quarterback coach.

"No. Are you kidding me?" Wannstedt said. "Matt Cavanaugh knows more about quarterback play than 99 percent of the people. He's forgotten more about quarterback play than most of the other guys know, and you can quote me on that."

Stull completed only 7 of 24 passes for 52 yards, with an interception, three sacks and a lost fumble against Oregon State, and Wannstedt acknowledged that Stull's play regressed since his career-high 279-yard passing performance against Rutgers. Although Wannstedt said he has yet to speak formally with Stull since the bowl game, he has no plans to bench Stull but will make the quarterback competition a focal point of spring drills.

"Billy ended up the season as the starter. The first day of spring practice, unless something happens between now and then, he deserves the opportunity to be the starter Day One," Wannstedt said, "but it's going to be as competitive as ever with Pat Bostick, Tino Sunseri and, depending on which direction we go with Greg Cross.

"Tino Sunseri is going to get a hard, hard look this spring, and so is Pat Bostick and so will Billy. We're going to be more demanding at that position than we've ever been because I think we all know that for us to take the next step, we've got to be more productive there and it's going to take a bigger commitment on my part, a bigger commitment on Matt Cavanaugh's part and a bigger commitment on our players' part for that to happen."

McCoy is eligible for the NFL Draft because he is three years removed from high school, and has until Jan. 15 to declare hardship for early entry. But Wannstedt expects McCoy to return next fall.

"I had a good talk with LeSean's parents at the bowl game and I've had several conversations with LeSean since he's been home before and after the bowl," Wannstedt said. "He's excited to come back for another year. LeSean believes, and his mom and dad believe, that he's excited about being here and we all believe that this next year will do nothing but enhance his opportunities for the National Football League."

In other Pitt football news, Wannstedt said tight end Nate Byham is having shoulder surgery this week. Left tackle Jason Pinkston will have an MRI today to determine whether he needs shoulder surgery, but Wannstedt said he is optimistic that it can be avoided. One freshman cornerback, Jarred Holley, will have arthroscopic knee surgery. Another, Ronald Hobby, has been dismissed from team. Running back recruit Dion Lewis of Blairstown (N.J.) Academy has enrolled early and will participate in spring drills.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.