ShareThis Page

Penguins GM: Shutting Crosby down 'never been discussed'

| Tuesday, Feb. 8, 2011

Tuesday arrived for the Penguins with no relief from continued speculation on Internet social media sites that superstar center Sidney Crosby has experienced setbacks in his recovery from a concussion.

Those reports, in addition to increased rumors that Crosby will miss the rest of this season, are untrue.

"It's never been discussed, never been thought of," Penguins general manager Ray Shero said of Crosby not returning from a concussion that has prevented him from playing since Jan. 5.

Crosby missed his 14th consecutive game last night when the Penguins played Columbus at Consol Energy Center. They are 8-5-1 without him.

He is with family at an undisclosed warm-weathered climate, where he is continuing what the Penguins have described as "functional rehab" that includes light exercises. He has not been cleared for workouts.

A post on social media site Twitter yesterday indicated Crosby "tried a light workout and immediately saw black dots and stars," and that he is "not even close to start light workouts again."

Multiple representatives from Crosby's camp denied that Twitter post from Mike Brophy, an NHL columnist for out of Canada.

Shero stressed patience regarding Crosby's recovery from a concussion that has left him with symptoms that still include occasional headaches.

The Penguins are trying to give Crosby space and keep him from focusing on hockey.

"I don't call Sidney Crosby every day and ask him how he's feeling," Shero said. "I haven't asked him how he's feeling once. It's not like he's coming back from a head injury or a shoulder injury and it's, 'Hey, how you doing — we've got this update from our trainers?'

"We just need be patient, and when he feels better, there's probably something to update in terms of progressing. To me, it's not about a time frame, it's about patience."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.