ShareThis Page

Duquesne's Everhart is NABC District 4 coach of the year

| Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Duquesne University's Ron Everhart has been selected District 4 men's basketball coach of the year by his peers in the National Association of Basketball Coaches.

Everhart, who guided the Dukes to a 19-13 record and a tie for fourth place in the Atlantic 10 Conference regular-season standings, is the first Duquesne coach to be honored by the NABC since Red Manning was named District 3 coach of the year in 1972.

District 4 consists of the 14 schools that make up the A-10. Also, former Pitt star Sean Miller was named District 20 coach of the year at Arizona after leading the Wildcats into the Elite Eight of the NCAA Tournament in just his second year at the Pac-10 school.

Duquesne, picked to finish eighth in the A-10 in a preseason poll of league coaches and media, began its league schedule with an 8-0 record and finished at 10-6 with a first-round bye in the A-10 tournament.

The Dukes, who started an all-freshman backcourt, are likely to lead Division I in assists (17.8 average), steals (9.9) and turnover margin (+6.7) when the final NCAA statistics are released following the conclusion of the Final Four.

Everhart, who took over a Duquesne program that was coming off a 3-24 record with an Ratings Percentage Index of 308 in 2005-06, has led the Dukes to three consecutive postseason appearances since 1971 -- two in the College Basketball Invitational and one in the National Invitation Tournament.

In five seasons at Duquesne, Everhart's teams have averaged 16.6 victories and have produced four consecutive non-losing records for the first time since 1973. Everhart and Manning, who went 247-138 (.642) in 16 seasons at Duquesne, are the only two Dukes coaches to be honored by the NABC.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.