Second suspect arrested in shooting of Clairton officer
A second man was arrested Friday night in the shooting of a Clairton police officer.
Marcus Andrejco-Jones was taken into custody and charged with shooting Officer James Kuzak Jr., 39, when police responded to a call about a home invasion Monday night, Allegheny County Police Lt. Andrew Schurman said.
Andrejco-Jones, who was taken into custody without incident at his Hawkins Village apartment in Rankin, was to be taken to Night Court for arraignment on numerous charges including assault on a police officer, aggravated assault, robbery and attempted homicide, Schurman said.
Myles Hutchinson, 21, of McKeesport, was arrested on similar charges Tuesday.
Earlier yesterday, Common Pleas Judge Edward J. Borkowski rejected a defense attorney's arguments to set a low bond for Hutchinson, who appeared via video conference from the jail and said nothing during the hearing.
Hutchinson's attorney, Fred Rabner, said his client steadfastly denies involvement. "He's begged the officers to go back and follow his path that night and watch videos from gas stations to show where he was," Rabner said, though he would not say where his client was or what he was doing.
Assistant District Attorney R. Bruce Linsenmayer said Hutchinson has a criminal past, citing two cases in which prosecutors withdrew charges and a conviction for marijuana possession.
In a 2008 case, McKeesport police accused Hutchinson of getting into a fight, pointing a gun at a man and threatening to kill him, court records show. The District Attorney's Office dropped the charges, after the victim and officers didn't show for trial and Judge Randal B. Todd declined to grant prosecutors a second delay. Linsenmayer said Hutchinson was arrested for a 2004 robbery, but the charges were withdrawn.
Rabner said Hutchinson wasn't in the Clairton neighborhood the night of Kuzak's shooting and witnesses wrongly picked him out of a police photo array. Kuzak, a graduate of Seton LaSalle High School and Point Park College, was shot in his forearm, side and shoulder above his bulletproof vest.
The Central Blood Bank, which is sponsoring two blood drives for Kuzak, said he required numerous transfusions to replace the volume of blood he lost. The blood bank estimates that Kuzak, who began working part-time in Clairton after leaving the Peters Police Department, lost half of his blood in the shooting.
Two bullets remain in Kuzak's body and more surgery is anticipated, the blood bank said.
Fellow officers have said there are fears that Kuzak, who remains hospitalized in UPMC Mercy, Uptown, could suffer paralysis from his wounds.Additional Information:
Central Blood Bank will host two blood drives for Clairton police Officer James Kuzak Jr.:
Monday -- noon to 7 p.m. at the Peters Township Fire Department on East McMurray Road; call 724-941-4176.
Tuesday -- noon to 7 p.m. at the Clairton Fire Department on Ravensburg Boulevard; call 412-233-8123.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.