Pitt researchers seek parent volunteers for autism study
University of Pittsburgh researchers announced today they are looking for parent volunteers for a new study to look at potential triggers for autism.
The study — funded by Heinz Endowments — will focus on genetic, environmental and biological factors that could cause autism spectrum disorders. Researchers are planning to talk with parents of young children — both with autism and without — about their homes, jobs, hobbies, medical conditions, medication use and other factors during the mother's pregnancy and the child's infancy. They also plan to look at air pollution and other environmental exposures for the children.
"Autism spectrum disorders are a major health concern," Dr. Evelyn Talbott, a professor of epidemiology at Pitt's Graduate School of Public Health and the study's principal investigator, said in a statement. "We hope that the results of this study will help lead to a better understanding of the role of environmental factors in ASDs."
The announcement of the research comes a day after scientific journals published the results of three studies showing that spontaneous and rare gene mutations are a likely cause of autism in children of parents who have never had the disease.
Pitt researchers are looking for about 750 parents from throughout southwestern Pennsylvania in Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Washington and Westmoreland counties to participate in the study. The study will try to determine whether substantial differences exist in the environmental and other exposures among children with autism and without.
For more information about participating in the study, visit www.childhoodautism.pitt.edu or call Constance M. Bayles, of GSPH's Department of Epidemiology is the project director at 412-624-3122.
Add Andrew Conte to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.